Calls for papers – Conferences taking place in October 2017

The American Short Story: New Horizons
Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany, 5-7 October 2017
Deadline for proposals: 30 June 2017

In cooperation with:
– the Society for the Study of the American Short Story,
– the American Literature Association, and the Obama Institute

Program coordinator: Oliver Scheiding
Organizing Committee:
James Nagel, Olivia Edenfield, Elke D’hoker,
Jochen Achilles, Dustin Anderson, Damien Schlarb

Throughout its history, the American short story has been praised either as a highly polished gem or condemned as literary fast food. Despite such rise-and-fall predictions, the short story has always been a demanding form. Its narrative economy in terms of time and space records decisive, intimate moments of life that give the American Short Story a broad social resonance. As such, the short story offers a vibrant field of research. There is a renaissance in progress not only in terms of the short story’s productivity but also in terms of innovative theoretical questions. The current state of research is, however, probably best described as “ripening.”

The conference “The American Short Story: New Horizons” invites both panels and papers that address fresh and original questions relevant to studying the American short story: how the genre works as performance in itself; how it conveys a theory of culture in which aesthetic structures and the presentation of cultural problematics interrelate; how the short story and the practices of text-making are related to the cultures of print in which textual circulation and economic exchange are homologues; how we can read the short story as an expressive form alongside its material dimensions, its vitality of forms (i.e., short-short fiction, flash fiction), and the multiple meanings of such concepts as authorship and genre; how we can reassess the short story as a field to map out exchanges not just among authors, but also among editors, publishers, reviewers, readers, and the physical text, with its advertisements, illustrations, and editorial changes. The conference thus seeks to explore the American short story as a coming together of the enduring narrative practice of compression and concision in American literature, presently culminating in a digital culture in which brevity rules.

Suggested Topics:

  • History of the American Short Story
  • American Short Story and Ethnicity
  • Gender/Sexuality Studies and the American Short Story
  • American Short Story and Literary/Cultural Theory
  • American Short Story and Linguistics
  • American Short Story and Psychology
  • American Short Story and Religion
  • Early Short Narratives prior to 1800
  • American Short Story and Periodicals
  • American Short Story and Graphic Narratives
  • American Short Story and Print Culture/Material Culture
  • American Short Story and Translation/Translators
  • American Short Story and Storytelling
  • New and old Forms: Short and Short-Short Stories
  • American Short Story Cycles
  • The American Short Story and Life Writing
  • American Short Stories and Authors
  • Flash Fiction and Microfiction
  • American Short Story and Visual Arts/Film
  • American Short Story and Digital Research
  • American Short Story and the Digital Age
  • American Short Stories and Globalization
  • American Short Stories and Transnationalism
  • American Short Stories and Medical Humanities
  • American Short Story and Literary Periodization/Movements
  • American Short Story and MFA Programs
  • American Short Story and Music/Theater
  • Editing and Anthologizing the American Short Story
  • Publishing and Reception of the American Short Story
  • American Short Story and Pedagogy
  • American Short Story and Genres (Novel, Novella, Essay etc.)
  • New Literary Histories on American Short Stories (1980s to the Present)

Proposals:
Panels and roundtables have three presenters, although some may have more. Proposals for pre-arranged panels should include a 250-300-word description of the topic and full contact information for all members of the group. The person submitting the proposal is the chair of the session. He or she may also be a presenter, but need not be.

All persons wishing to give a paper at the conference, including all members of pre-arranged panels, should give a one-paragraph abstract of the paper to be presented along with a biographical paragraph giving the credentials of the presenter to address this topic. Individual papers should be scheduled for 20 minutes.

The organizing committee screens all proposals and abstracts, issues acceptances, and arranges the presentations on the program.  It will form panels to accommodate papers not included in pre-arranged groups.
Please submit all proposals and abstracts to Oliver Scheiding (scheiding@uni-mainz.de) by June 30, 2017.

(posted 22 November 2016)


Industrial Heritage in the UK: Mutations, Conversions & Representations
University of Rennes, France, 10 October 2017
Deadline for proposals: 15 May 2017

University of Rennes, France – Research team ACE (EA 1796)

Website: https://indusheritage17.sciencesconf.org/

Since the mid-1950s, the UK has been experiencing a growing interest in the study, protection and conservation of industrial heritage, and is often considered as a forerunner in the advocacy of this idiosyncratic heritage and of its significance and potentialities. This rise in public awareness started with the development of industrial archaeology as a discipline in its own right, which later led industrial heritage to be seen as a resource for regeneration. In this respect, regeneration through the provision of new uses for derelict buildings also corresponded to a surge in urban renewal policies in the context of deindustrialization and to the current calls for sustainable development.

If the intentional disappearance of industrial vestiges caused popular outrage in the past and if industrial archaeologists and conservationists are sometimes unable to keep up with the quick pace of creative destruction in today’s redeveloping urban areas, the rhetoric of the tabula rasa is nonetheless increasingly contested. This is partly due to the positive contribution that innovative reinterpretations of existing industrial structures can make towards the retention of the palimpsestic quality of the urban fabric, as well as towards the promotion of a sense of place also based on an interconnection between past and present. Last but not least, nowadays the demolition of sound industrial buildings as if they were disposable resources runs counter to the promotion of a rational, cost-efficient – and environmentally friendly – urban revitalization.

The research project will mainly revolve around industrial buildings such as former textile mills, factories, warehouses, industrial infrastructures – whether they are listed or not – as well as on their surroundings when they constitute a landscape and/or are integrated into a conservation area. The scope of objects of study is not limited to sites inherited from the 18th and 19th centuries as it also includes those which came into being throughout the 20th century. The ambition of this one-day conference is to explore changes in the field of industrial heritage, its instrumental role in the provision of spaces for tourism, culture, and urban regeneration in general, and potential conflicts arising from the relationship between those various processes. Yet it will also be crucial to examine representations of industrial society and the tangible traces of industry in order to foreground mutations in terms of how industrial heritage has been depicted and perceived ever since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Thus it will offer a more comprehensive picture of the contrasting visions of a once neglected heritage.

The chosen perspective for this one-day conference is an inter- and pluri-disciplinary one and it is therefore articulated around a variety of approaches such as cultural geography, cultural history, art history, media studies, urban studies, heritage studies, architecture, etc. Possible subthemes of research may include:

  • Industrial ruins and post-industrial landscapes: creative acts inspired by engagements with physical testimonies to the past, their otherness and unstable state.
  • Recycling industrial buildings and their immediate environment through culture and heritage.
  •  Reinterpreting industrial sites for creative uses: questioning the inventiveness, viability and durability of adaptive re-use by the creative industries.
  • Assessing the legibility and permanence of the past in the conversion of industrial buildings.
  • Conservation and conversions: conflicts arising amidst architectural, cultural, historical, economic and promotional priorities.
  • Contemporary architectural interventions on the industrial urban fabric: an act of enhancement, detraction or debasement of heritage?
  • The protection and conservation of the industrial built environment: a challenge for urban planners and developers.
  • Representations of a vanishing industrial society and its heritage: depicting the industrial past, its people and its physical reminders in urban and rural landscapes.
  • The contribution of industrial heritage to tourism in post-industrial areas.
  • The birth of environmentalism in an increasingly industrial and urban British society in the late 18th century and its development in the 19th century onwards.
  • New functions for vacant industrial buildings: the discourse of sustainable development in cities.

Scientific Committee : Aurore Caignet, Renée Dickason, Tim Edensor, Julian Holder, David Haigron, Guillaume Clément, Nicole Cloarec, Jose-Manuel Lopes-Cordeiro, Laurence Gourievidis, Lesley Lelourec.

Please send your proposals (maximum 500 words) in English with a short biography to Aurore Caignet aurorecaignet@gmail.com by 15 May 2017.

(posted 21 November 2016)


Last pages, last shots
Université de Caen Normandie, France, 13-14 October 2017
Deadline for proposals: 27 March 2017

This conference continues a sequence of international events exploring the question of closure  as well as the question of adaptation.[1] We would like to turn now to the adaptation of the last pages of a novel to the screen.

In this conference, we intend to measure and comment the stakes of adaptation to the screen at the end of a novel. An adaptation is necessarily the product of a specific reading of a text; it is an appropriation that can lead to a change in the end of the source text. The close of a novel, however, is both the moment when literary traditions hold strongest – and when the author may take up the challenge to buck those traditions, to distance the work once and for all from foregone conclusions (Larroux). Can the same be said of film? Does the filmmaker’s vision replace that of the novelist? Does the end of a film also signal its tendency to either follow or challenge tradition? Classic Hollywood films end with a concluding scene, followed by an epilogue (Bordwell), thus imitating the traditional novel, but adaptations are frequently the subject of narrative and structural changes, for various reasons. Hollywood’s love of the happy end is well known, while the transformation of Jane Austen’s novels into simple love stories is a striking example of Hollywood’s need to appeal to a mass audience. In animated adaptations of fairy tales, the trend is even more obvious: Walt Disney’s The Little Mermaid (1989) is but one example, born of a desire to not shock children (or their parents). Beyond this, a change to the ending can be a selling point: the producers of the recent adaptation of Gone Girl (2014) actually promoted the film by promising that it rewrote the final act, thus maintaining the suspense that readers felt, or perhaps correcting an ending that was somewhat controversial.

Beyond these transformations made to the storyline, writing for the screen necessarily engenders structural changes, be it the transition from the last images to the credits, or the move from a last chapter to the last act of a film. When the adaptation is to the endless present of television, where the ending (or conversely, the continuation) of a story is often decided not by creative choice but by ratings and network dictate, these structural changes are even more pronounced. Thus we are interested in both the ideological implications of changes made in adapting these final pages to the screen, as well as the aesthetic stance taken in modifying (or on the contrary, maintaining) the ending of the source text.

We could also compare open and closed endings when they are adapted to the screen; if we think of the open endings that Torgovnik referred to as “scenic” that proliferate in the novels of Henry James, and are themselves a testament to the influence of the theater, ending with an ongoing dialogue – can we find a similar technique at work in film, or does the adaptation tend to offer a more definitive ending?

Bibliography

  • Bordwell, David. “Happily Ever After, Part 2”. Velvet Light Trap 19 (1982): 2-7.
  • —.  Narration in the Fiction Film. London: Routledge, 1985.
  • Hock, Tobias.  “Film endings”. In Last Things: Essays on Ends and Endings. Ed. Gavin Hopps et al. Aachen British and American studies 19. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2014. 65-79.
  • Larroux, Guy. Le Mot de la fin. La clôture romanesque en question. Paris : Nathan, 1995.
  • Neupert, Richard. The End, Narration and Closure in the Cinema. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1995.
  • Torgovnick, Mariana. Closure in the Novel. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton UP, 1981.

Proposals are to be sent to Dr Armelle Parey, Université de Caen Normandie (armelle.parey@unicaen.fr) and Pr. Shannon Wells-Lassagne, Université de Bourgogne Franche Comté (shannon.wellslassagne@gmail.com) by March 27th, 2017. Answers will be received in the following month.

[1] Happy Endings and Films (dir. Armelle Parey, Isabelle Roblin et Dominique Sipière). Paris : Michel Houdiard, 2010; Literary Happy Endings : Closure for Sunny Imaginations. (dir. Armelle Parey and Isabelle Roblin). Aachen : Shaker Verlag, 2012; L’Inachevé ou l’ère des possibles dans la littérature anglophone, Récits ouverts et incomplets. (dir. François Gallix, Armelle Parey et Isabelle Roblin). Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen, 2014; Character Migration in Anglophone Literature. (dir. Armelle Parey et Isabelle Roblin).  E-rea [on-line], 13.1 | 2015. https://erea.revues.org/4546)

L’adaptation cinématographique : première pages, premiers plans. sous la direction de D. Letort et S. Wells-Lassagne, Mare &Martin, 2014.

(posted 7 November 2016)


The Reformation in Europe and its Echoes: Marking the 500th anniversary of Luther’s theses
Osijek, Croatia, 19-20 October 2017
Deadline for proposals: 1 April 2017

osijekThe Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Osijek, Evangelical Theological Seminary, and the Department of Cultural Studies at the Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, together with the Croatian Institute of History, Department for the History of Slavonia, Syrmia and Baranya in Slavonski Brod invite paper proposals for an interdisciplinary conference marking the 500th anniversary of the Reformation
Venue: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jägerova 9, Osije, Croatia
The sixteenth century saw the beginning of the Reformation, a religious and social movement which, based on the ideas of Renaissance and Humanism, constitutes one of the most significant events in the theological, cultural and political history of Europe, its effects long-lasting and visible to this day. The Reformation challenged the structure, practice, and theology of the Church resulting in its schism, but the Reformation’s consequences greatly transcended the area of theology and religious practice. Religious conflicts instigated wars, altered borders and political structures in Europe, and left a deep mark on European culture and art. The translations of the Bible into national languages, the freedom and the right of an individual to interpret the Bible for themselves, as well as the belief that it is everyone’s individual responsibility to provide for their own salvation increased the interest in and reverence for the written word. This has effected a great change in the perception of national (vernacular) languages which changed the general attitude toward literature, and brought about the development of new literary genres and a new style in art.
Based on the comprehensiveness of the causes, consequences, and effects of the Reformation, the conference organizers invite scholars from various disciplines to reflect on the following topics, or other topics related to the conference theme:

  • Pre-Reformation Period: movements and leaders
  • Leading figures of the Reformation
  • Reformation and Humanism
  • Pontificate during the Reformation
  • Catholic Revival and Counter-Reformation
  • Historical development of Protestant confessions and denominationsReformation and political history
  • Reformation and social history
  • Reformation and cultural history
  • Reformation and source criticism
  • Reformation and history of mentality
  • Reformation and Protestantism in Croati
  • Leading figures of the Reformation in Croatia
  • Reformation and historiography

SOCIOLOGY

  • Reformation and (post)modernisation
  • Reformation and social values
  • Reformation and secularization
  • Reformation and demographic changes
  • Reformation and economic development

PHILOSOPHY

  • Ethics and Reformation
  • Philosophy of politics
  • Philosophy of religion

PEDAGOGY

  • Theoretical precepts of Reformation pedagogy
  • Luther’s views on education
  • Criticism of scholastic pedagogy from the point of view of Protestantism
  • Attitudes to higher education and universities
  • Family education in the spirit of Protestantism
  • Education in the spirit of the Reformation and its main regional proponents
  • Echoes of the Reformation in educational practice in Croatian schools
  • Impact of the Reformation on education in Croatian lands

PHILOLOGY

  • Cultural and literary echoes of the Reformation
  • Sermon as a literary gen
  • Reformation and the Bible
  • Lollards and adaptations of orthodox texts
  • Precursors to the novel
  • The Book of Common Prayers and prayer-books
  • Echoes of the Reformation in the methodology of literary scholarship
  • The character of Martin Luther in the realm of literary fiction
  • Reformation, drama, and theatre
  • Reformation and the German language
  • Echoes of the Reformation in Croatian linguistic and literary traditio
  • National and European frameworks of Croatian Protestant literature during the Reformation
  • Croatian Protestant translators in Urach and Regensburg
  • Reformation movement in the realm of Croatian Glagolitic literary and linguistic history
  • Dissemination of Reformation teaching in Croatian religious literature for common people
  • The working languages of the conference are Croatian, English, and German.

Please e-mail your 300-word abstracts by 1 April 2017 to the official address of the conference: reformacija2017@ffos.hr
The conference fee is 300 HRK or 50,00 EUR (student fee: 100 HRK or 15,00 EUR) and is due by 10 September 2017.
Payment details:
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Osijek, Croatia
IBAN: HR8423600001102484368
SWIFT: ZABAHR2X
Reference: Reformation Conference

The deadline for submission of papers to be published will be announced at a later date. All papers will undergo peer-review. The accepted papers will be published in the conference proceedings.

Conference secretary: Luka Pejić, mag. educ. philol. angl. et mag. educ. hist.
Organizational board:
Assistant professor Dubravka Božić Bogović, Ph.D., Full professor Peter Kuzmič, Ph.D., Stanko Andrić, Ph.D., Full professor Ružica Pšihistal, Ph.D., Full professor Milica Lukić, Ph.D., Associate professor Zoran Velagić, Ph.D., Associate professor Jelena Lakuš, Ph.D., Assistant professor Željko Pavić, Ph.D., Assistant professor Ljubica Matek, Ph.D., Assistant professor Mirko Lukaš, Ph.D., Sonja Novak, Ph.D., Zdravko Perić, Ph.D., Gabriela Dobsai, mag. philol. hung. et mag. educ. hist.

Downland the call for papers in English or in German.

(posted 21 November 2016)


Biography & Verity
Maison de la Recherche – Aix-Marseille Université, France, 20-21 October 2017
Deadline for proposals: 1st February, 2017

mosaic-verity-of-a-lifeInterdisciplinary Colloquium of Federation CRISIS
Biography Society http://biographysociety.org
LERMA (EA 853) – CAER (EA 854) – IrASIA (UMR 7306)

Biography entertains a peculiar relationship to the notion of verity, by aiming far less at the Truth than at the fluctuating truths of unique individual lives. Indeed, in science and in the humanities alike, truth appears to us today as a construction, always conveyed by a discourse ; indeed, verity is an unattainable horizon, an object of desire that keeps receding on and on as we strive to get closer to it, but the very quest ceaselessly modifies the landscape of our knowledge. The recent development of ‘biofiction’ can be interpreted as a ‘biographisation’ of contemporary fiction, which characterises our time, and is comparable to the ‘novelisation’ of genres one century ago. This phenomenon is what Hans Renders, Binne de Haan et Jonne Harmsma investigate in The Biographical Turn : Lives in History (Routledge, 2016). In historiography and philosophy of history, Hayden White’s theses, especially in The Fiction of Narrative (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010), like Ivan Jablonka’s in L’histoire est une littérature contemporaine (Seuil, 2014), clearly pose the problem of the partly fictional, and in any case literary nature of historiography. Biography, commonly described as a hybrid genre, between history and literature (see Michael Benton, Toward a Poetics of Literary Biography, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), is distinguished by a peculiar aesthetics; it is assessed (by readers, critics, and the juries of literary awards) by the double standard of the verity of the knowledge it conveys, and the quality of the style in which it is expresses it.
A biographer is expected, on the one hand, to administrate the proof of what she writes in her texts and paratexts, and, on the other hand, to do so while producing a text where the pleasure to read must satisfy the desire to know: where scientific quest and aesthetic experience cross-fertilize one another. The most interesting biographers are those for whom literary writing is not a mere form but their very method, the very path of their thinking towards a better understanding of their subject. Some are fascinated by the gradual metamorphoses their characters goes through, others keep swinging backward and forward in the chronological unravelling of a life, unwilling to wrench their eyes from the accomplished historical personage. Mixing memory and desire, scientific truth and literary verity, biography is a peculiar field, a crossroads of humanities, where a significant turn is taking place. The biographic turn partakes of a reprise, a new start, a reorientation of writing and reading towards this verity, always surprising, of which we cannot but see that it is the text that our lives are made of.
Contributions can propose theoretical reflexions on the notion of verity in biography, or case studies, interrogating for instance the political uses of biography to inflect the “truth” about a person in the eyes of the public, addressing methods of investigation and verification of the facts, or analysing literary, rhetorical, strategies of administration of the proof. They also be studies of the paratexts (footnote, prefaces, postfaces, documentary appendixes, etc.), or of the iconographic illustrations, taking especially into account the impact of photography. Considerations on the cinema are also expected, investigating the special relationship of biographical films to historical truth. In the field of digital humanities, the truth effect of on-line biographical notices and dictionaries of biography, as well as the impact of digital tools on biographical research are a case in point. Papers should also address fictionalisation as a method of investigative construction to fill in the gaps of documentation.
Proposals, in French or in English, with a provisional title, an abstract no longer than 100 words, and 5 key-words, should be sent before February 1st, 2017, to Pr Joanny Moulin joanny.moulin@univ-amu.fr & Pr Yannick Gouchan yannick.gouchan@univ-amu.fr.

(posted 5 November 2017)